Rivermate | Philippines flag

Philippines

Dispute Resolution and Legal Compliance

Understand dispute resolution mechanisms and legal compliance in Philippines

Labor courts and arbitration panels

The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) is a quasi-judicial body in the Philippines that is mandated to resolve labor disputes. The NLRC is composed of a central office and regional arbitration branches located throughout the country. It has the power to resolve labor disputes through compulsory and voluntary arbitration, issue writs of injunction or restraining orders in labor cases, and enforce its own decisions and orders.

Labor Arbiters

Labor arbiters are the first level of adjudication within the NLRC. They hear and decide cases within their jurisdiction and issue decisions which can be appealed to the NLRC Commission.

NLRC Commission

The NLRC Commission is the second level of adjudication within the NLRC. It is composed of a Chairman and Commissioners, often grouped into divisions. The Commission reviews decisions of labor arbiters and issues final and executory decisions on labor cases if no appeal is filed.

Voluntary Arbitration

Voluntary arbitration is an alternative to compulsory arbitration, where parties agree to submit their dispute to a voluntary arbitrator. In this process, the parties select the arbiter and the process is governed by the parties' agreement. Voluntary arbitrators resolve disputes based on the evidence presented and their decisions are generally binding on the parties.

Jurisdiction of Labor Courts and Arbitration Panels

The NLRC has jurisdiction over unfair labor practice (ULP) cases, termination disputes, claims for wages, benefits, and other monetary claims, and intra-union and inter-union disputes. Voluntary arbitration handles cases that parties agree to submit to arbitration, which may overlap with NLRC jurisdiction.

Process in Labor Courts and Arbitration

Compulsory Arbitration before the NLRC

The process begins with the filing of a complaint with the NLRC regional arbitration branch. This is followed by conciliation and mediation where the parties attempt to settle the dispute amicably. If no settlement is reached, a labor arbiter conducts a formal hearing. The labor arbiter then issues a decision, which either party may appeal to the NLRC Commission. The NLRC Commission then issues a final and executory decision.

Voluntary Arbitration

In voluntary arbitration, parties enter into a written agreement to submit their dispute to arbitration. The parties then select an arbitrator who conducts a hearing. The arbitrator then issues a binding decision.

Typical Cases Handled

Typical cases handled by labor courts and arbitration panels include unfair labor practices such as discrimination and interference with union activities, illegal dismissal/termination, monetary claims such as non-payment of wages, overtime pay, holiday pay, etc., Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) disputes such as interpretation or violation of CBA terms, and strikes and lockouts.

Compliance audits and inspections

Compliance audits and inspections are systematic evaluations to determine if an organization is adhering to relevant laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies. They're designed to identify areas of non-compliance, potential risks, and opportunities to improve processes to uphold legal and ethical standards.

Importance of Compliance Audits and Inspections

  • Risk Mitigation: Identifying potential compliance issues proactively can help businesses avoid costly fines, penalties, and damage to their reputation.
  • Improved Efficiency: Audits help optimize the implementation of regulations and business operations.
  • Enhanced Reputation: Demonstrates a commitment to ethical practices, increasing the attractiveness of the business to investors, clients, and partners.
  • Protection of Stakeholders: Compliance ensures that the business is operating in a way that safeguards the interests of employees, customers, and the community.

Who Conducts Compliance Audits and Inspections

  • Government Agencies: Various government agencies are mandated to conduct audits and inspections within their specific areas of jurisdiction. Examples include:
    • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR): Conducts tax audits to ensure compliance with tax laws and regulations.
    • Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE): Enforces labor laws through labor inspections, covering areas like wages, working hours, safety, and health.
    • Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR): Conducts environmental audits and inspections to monitor compliance with environmental regulations.
  • Internal Auditors: Many businesses employ internal auditors to perform regular compliance audits and inspections. This ensures ongoing adherence to internal policies and procedures.
  • External Auditors: Organizations may hire third-party auditors to conduct independent compliance audits to ensure objectivity or in instances where specialized expertise is needed.

Frequency of Compliance Audits and Inspections

The frequency of these activities varies depending on the specific regulations, industry, and the risks involved, Some regulations require them annually, while others may be mandated less frequently or based on specific triggers or complaints.

Types of Compliance Audits and Inspections in the Philippines

  • Financial Audits: Assess the accuracy of financial statements and internal financial controls.
  • Tax Audits: Examine tax returns and supporting documentation to ensure compliance with tax laws.
  • Labor Inspections: Investigate workplaces to ensure compliance with labor standards.
  • Environmental Audits: Assess compliance with environmental regulations and the environmental impact of business operations.
  • Safety Audits: Focus on verifying compliance with occupational safety and health standards.
  • Social Compliance Audits: Ensure businesses are upholding ethical labor practices, human rights, and responsible sourcing standards.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, including:

  • Fines and Penalties: Regulatory agencies may impose substantial fines and penalties for violations.
  • Business Disruption: Failure to comply can lead to forced closures, suspension or revocation of licenses, or halt operations.
  • Legal Liability: Businesses may face lawsuits and legal action for non-compliance, leading to costly legal fees and settlements.
  • Reputational Damage: Non-compliance can harm the reputation of the business leading to the loss of customers and business partners.

Reporting and whistleblower protections

In the Philippines, there are several channels available for individuals to report potential misconduct or violations of the law within organizations. These include internal reporting mechanisms, the Office of the Ombudsman, the Civil Service Commission (CSC), and specialized agencies such as the Commission on Audit (COA) and the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).

Internal Reporting Mechanisms

Many companies and government entities have formal internal reporting procedures. These often include designated personnel (e.g., compliance officers, ethics hotlines) where employees can raise concerns confidentially.

Ombudsman

The Office of the Ombudsman is an independent constitutional body tasked with investigating and prosecuting government officials accused of wrongdoing. The Ombudsman has the authority to receive and investigate complaints filed against public officials and employees.

Civil Service Commission (CSC)

The CSC is the central human resource agency of the Philippine government. It has jurisdiction over administrative cases against civil servants, which can include violations of laws, rules, and regulations. Whistleblowers can report cases of corruption or misconduct to the CSC.

Specialized Agencies

For specific areas of misconduct, specialized agencies exist. Reports on financial irregularities and misuse of government funds can be submitted to COA. If the violation involves suspected money laundering activities, reports can be filed with the AMLC.

Protections for Whistleblowers

While there is no single, overarching whistleblower protection law in the Philippines, various legal provisions offer some degree of protection. These include the 1987 Philippine Constitution (Article XI, Section 1), Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees), Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act), Republic Act No. 9485 (Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007), and specific sectoral laws.

Practical Considerations for Whistleblowers

Whistleblowers should gather as much documentation as possible to substantiate their claims, choose the mechanism best suited to the type of violation and severity of the misconduct, gauge whether the reporting mechanism allows for anonymity and its effectiveness, evaluate potential retaliatory measures, and seek legal counsel if necessary. They should also reach out to trusted individuals, support groups, or legal resources for guidance and protection.

International labor standards compliance

The Philippines is a signatory to numerous conventions of the International Labor Organization (ILO), which shape international labor standards. These standards focus on fundamental principles and rights at work, governance conventions, and technical conventions. The latter address specific workplace issues, including occupational safety and health, wages, working hours, maternity protection, and more.

Key Conventions & Compliance

The Philippines has ratified several core ILO conventions, demonstrating its commitment to these standards. These include ILO Convention No. 87 - Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention (1948), ILO Convention No. 98 - Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention (1949), and ILO Convention No. 29 - Forced Labour Convention (1930), No. 105 - Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (1957), and No. 182 - Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (1999). These conventions aim to protect workers' rights to form and join unions, engage in collective bargaining with employers, eliminate all forms of forced labor, and protect children from exploitative work. The country has also ratified ILO Convention No. 100 - Equal Remuneration Convention (1951) and No. 111 - Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention (1958), which promote equal pay for work of equal value and aim to eliminate discrimination in the workplace.

Incorporating ILO Standards into Domestic Law

The Philippines has made efforts to align its domestic labor laws with ratified ILO conventions. Key examples of this alignment include The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended), Republic Act No. 9231: An Act Providing for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor and Affording Stronger Protection for the Working Child, and Republic Act No. 10361: An Act Instituting Policies for the Protection and Welfare of Domestic Workers (Batas Kasambahay).

Enforcement and Challenges

The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) is the primary agency tasked with enforcing labor laws and ensuring compliance with international labor standards. However, the Philippines faces challenges in full implementation including a significant portion of the workforce remaining in the informal sector, limited resources for labor inspections and enforcement, and the prevalence of contractual work arrangements that can undermine job security and workers' rights.

Continuous Improvement

The Philippines has demonstrated ongoing efforts to strengthen its labor laws and practices to align with international standards. Continued collaboration between the government, workers' organizations, employers, and the ILO is crucial to address existing gaps and ensure decent work for all Filipinos.

Rivermate | A 3d rendering of earth

Hire your employees globally with confidence

We're here to help you on your global hiring journey.